Page 1 of 1

uDMX with QLC+ on Ubuntu 16.4

Posted: Thu Nov 16, 2017 10:02 pm
by JSAC
Hi i have used several usb-DMX and it has worked fine with QLC+ on Ubuntu 16.4
Now when i finaly got my own from China its not so easy.
I have been searching alot to find a driver to get it to work, but im stuck.

I got this from dmesg:
[480765.316831] usb 3-2: new low-speed USB device number 54 using xhci_hcd
[480765.512192] usb 3-2: New USB device found, idVendor=16c0, idProduct=05dc
[480765.512197] usb 3-2: New USB device strings: Mfr=1, Product=2, SerialNumber=3
[480765.512199] usb 3-2: Product: uDMX
[480765.512201] usb 3-2: Manufacturer: www.anyma.ch
[480765.512203] usb 3-2: SerialNumber: ilLUTZminator001
[490434.925598] usb 3-2: usbfs: USBDEVFS_CONTROL failed cmd UDMXDevice rqt 64 rq 2 len 512 ret -71
[494682.105226] usb 3-2: USB disconnect, device number 54
[494685.468341] usb 3-2: new low-speed USB device number 55 using xhci_hcd
[494685.663263] usb 3-2: New USB device found, idVendor=16c0, idProduct=05dc
[494685.663273] usb 3-2: New USB device strings: Mfr=1, Product=2, SerialNumber=3
[494685.663278] usb 3-2: Product: uDMX
[494685.663282] usb 3-2: Manufacturer: www.anyma.ch
[494685.663286] usb 3-2: SerialNumber: ilLUTZminator001
[495011.688856] usb 3-2: USB disconnect, device number 55
[495039.486692] usb 3-2: new low-speed USB device number 56 using xhci_hcd
[495039.682343] usb 3-2: New USB device found, idVendor=16c0, idProduct=05dc
[495039.682352] usb 3-2: New USB device strings: Mfr=1, Product=2, SerialNumber=3
[495039.682357] usb 3-2: Product: uDMX
[495039.682362] usb 3-2: Manufacturer: www.anyma.ch
[495039.682366] usb 3-2: SerialNumber: ilLUTZminator001

So what have i missed to do?
/Urban

Re: uDMX with QLC+ on Ubuntu 16.4

Posted: Fri Nov 17, 2017 7:55 am
by mcallegari

Re: uDMX with QLC+ on Ubuntu 16.4

Posted: Sat Nov 18, 2017 2:45 pm
by JSAC
Hi
Im sorry i have tried to understand how udev works.
I have read pages upp and down but dont get how it works.
the file z65-anyma-udmx.rules is in /etc/udev/rules.d$
/etc/udev/rules.d$ cat z65-anyma-udmx.rules
# These rules should work on newer udev architecture as well as the older one.
# Basically they watch for all "usb" subsystem add/change events, that occur
# for Anyma's uDMX devices and clones, and
# set their device nodes' permissions so that ALL users can read and write to
# them. The devices nodes are found under /dev/bus/usb/xxx/yyy.
SUBSYSTEM=="usb*", ACTION=="add|change", ATTRS{idVendor}=="16c0", ATTRS{idProduct}=="05dc", MODE="0666"
SUBSYSTEM=="usb*", ACTION=="add|change", SYSFS{idVendor}=="16c0", SYSFS{idProduct}=="05dc", MODE="0666"

SUBSYSTEM=="usb*", ACTION=="add|change", ATTRS{idVendor}=="03eb", ATTRS{idProduct}=="8888", MODE="0666"
SUBSYSTEM=="usb*", ACTION=="add|change", SYSFS{idVendor}=="03eb", SYSFS{idProduct}=="8888", MODE="0666"

If this is loaded or not i can not figure out!!

I have monitored :
udevadm monitor -u
monitor will print the received events for:
UDEV - the event which udev sends out after rule processing

UDEV [732364.430715] remove /devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:14.0/usb3/3-2/3-2:1.0 (usb)
UDEV [732364.433433] remove /devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:14.0/usb3/3-2 (usb)
UDEV [732367.962549] add /devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:14.0/usb3/3-2 (usb)
UDEV [732367.965810] add /devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:14.0/usb3/3-2/3-2:1.0 (usb)

But how to get it work i can not figure out.
I have som missing knowlige here.
Please help me in the right direction!
/Urban

Re: uDMX with QLC+ on Ubuntu 16.4

Posted: Sat Nov 18, 2017 6:06 pm
by JSAC
I really do not understand!?
I try to comunicate in a humble way here.
I post some compleating information on i former posts with some possible answers to the problem.

Then you disaprove an delete it a say its not relevant to the topic??????
Have you even reed it?
And then im totaly without possibilities to comunicate with you!
Is this common manners?

I have tried to be humble an polite here, and get treated like this!
I have allways talked good about QLC to all i know!

Regards
Urban Jonsson
Sweden

Re: uDMX with QLC+ on Ubuntu 16.4

Posted: Sun Nov 19, 2017 8:41 am
by mcallegari
I disapproved and left you a message "please use attachments for long logs". Did YOU read it ?
It's just a common practice to avoid very long (and unreadable) posts. Nothing personal with you. No need to act histerically